Most writers hate this question. They reject the very idea of self-publishing because they think it is the final sign that they have abandoned their dream of becoming a published author.
I’d like to suggest that rather than surrendering your literary ambitions, deciding to self-publish is increasingly becoming an artistic choice; a move towards self-actualisation, that shows just how seriously you are taking your writing.
Times have changed from when self-publishing meant vanity publishing. There are now firms offering specific services on the path to a self-published book and the author chooses what they need from the publishing firm they hire (eg editorial, marketing advice, blurb writing, cover selection, production and distribution).
Print-on-demand means that a very short print run is cost effective, and in some cases this may be all the writer needs – if you are writing the story of your family before you forget it all, or to put your point of view without being interrupted, a limited number of copies may be sufficient.
For others, who continue to cherish the thought of gaining an external investor some day, putting your work in a finished format through self-publishing may allow you to circulate it yourself, gain feedback, subsequently offer it to an external publisher and see it professionally published – it does happen. Meanwhile parking the finished manuscript in a pleasing and permanent form allows you some distance from the project – and the chance to move on with the rest of your life, including your writing.
There is no disgrace in the process – Jane Austen’s first work was self-published, and her investment in the process was considerable – the cost of publication was more than a third of her household’s annual income.
It was revealed recently that in the US last year more titles were self-published than published (240,000: 230,000) – so given that this is no longer a marginal pursuit, perhaps it is time that we too moved on from the rather home-spun name.
This process, in which the product is produced to the author’s specifications, and their involvement can be seen in every stage, from typeface to cover design is, in effect, a bespoke publishing service. In a world where image is all, viewing alternative publishing routes as equally respectable is important if authors are to maintain pride in their craft.
Alison Baverstock
What do you think, would you consider self-publishing? Do you like the name 'bespoke publishing', or do you think that's a form of vanity in itself?
Alison Baverstock is the author of Marketing your book, an author’s guide and is course leader of the MA Publishing at Kingston University.
The more names, the more confusion. Self-Publishing is simple and easy to understand. Regarding it, there are many good reasons why successful authors don't. (Money, experience, etc...). But writers are the quintissential do-it yourselfers. If someone finds a way to self-publish in the mainstream and successfully compete with big name authors, everyone would do it. One way would be for an author to start his own publishing company, whose business would depend on the success of published material (like DesiLu was for the movie industry). In reality though, what most beginning writers want, is someone who already knows the trade to take an interest in their work and help them advance their talent without having to go to the bank. No one wants to go it alone. It's just sometimes, they have no choice.