Short story competition - again!

by Jessica Irena Smith
30th March 2014

Sorry to bring this topic up again, but I really felt I had to comment on some of the negative posts re this year’s short story competition. I’ve been a member of the W&A site for some time and have never posted before, but just can’t believe the fuss some people are making over an honest mistake. Poor admin!

For the record, I didn’t enter the short story competition (nor have I ever entered any of the W&A competitions), but I am an artist and, as such, have submitted to many art competitions over the years. Some I’ve achieved success in, others not; but whatever the outcome, in my experience, these types of competitions rarely run without a hitch. For example, closing dates often get extended, so shortlisting and results are inevitably delayed. Even the most prestigious of competitions, run by well-established organisations, can have problems: I was once sent an email telling me I hadn’t been shortlisted for a competition, then received a phone call to say that the email was a mistake and that my work had been shortlisted. It can be a frustrating experience, whether you make the shortlist or not, but venting your frustrations on a public forum is probably not advisable. For one, no matter how often you say it’s ‘not sour grapes’, it still comes across as sour grapes! That aside, it’s also unprofessional: do you really want someone in the industry you’re trying to break into reading your complaints about how, in your – let’s face it, amateur – opinion, they could have run the competition better, or that you don’t think much of the shortlisted entries? Bombarding the site and admin with gripes over the winning piece being poetry, or shortlisted entrants being registered (or not) on the site, is pointless because it is not going to change the outcome. And whatever you do, don’t criticise the judging panel – all this will do is cause offence. Judges are usually experienced professionals in the field that they are judging and are often giving their time free. Whether there’s one judge or ten, the decision will always be a subjective one – that’s the nature of the arts. In a competition where over 3000 have entered and only a handful are shortlisted, the majority of entrants will inevitably be disappointed. Instead, focus on how fortunate you are to have had your work read by someone in the industry. I don’t know if W&A charge an entry fee for their competitions but, if they do, that’s standard practice these days. It doesn’t mean the competition is a scam (think how much admin work is involved in dealing with over 3000 entries!). I don’t remember the last time I entered a competition for free – for art competitions, it’s often at least £25 per artwork submitted.

At the end of the day, of course being shortlisted is great – it adds to your C.V. and gets exposure for your work – but even if you don’t make the cut, the experience you’ve gained from entering is invaluable. Learn from it and move on. The shortlisted entrants didn’t get shortlisted because they were ‘lucky’ – they worked hard and are deserved winners. What a pity their achievement has been soured by some people questioning the validity of a competition run by a reputable and well-established publishing house.

Replies

I'm afraid I missed all the fuss about the short story competition and what was or wasn't eligible.

All I would like to know is who is the winner and when and where can I read a copy of the winning entry.

I know I haven't won, because the shortlist was published some time ago. The winner was due to be announced "in March" if I remember correctly, but I can't see it anywhere on the W&A website. Help, please.

Profile picture for user maryfrom_21818
Mary
Hodges
330 points
Developing your craft
Film, Music, Theatre, TV and Radio
Poetry
Short stories
Fiction
Autobiography, Biography and Memoir
Comic
Speculative Fiction
Adventure
Historical
Mary Hodges
07/04/2014

Ah Rosa, this is where I have to resurrect my apology of the other day. I'm afraid I made the crass mistake when reading Adrians post of thinking he was Nathan, I thought Adrian was saying he was Nathan and that Adrian was his pseudonym, not so, he was quoting Nathan when he said it's not my work, so again my apology I couldn't find the post from Nathan but the mistake was mine. again sorry I hope this puts an end t it all and buries my acute embarrassment.

Regards Paul

Profile picture for user paul_garside
Paul
Garside
330 points
Ready to publish
Fiction
Comic
Crime, Mystery, Thriller
Gothic and Horror
Middle Grade (Children's)
Picture Books (Children's)
Adventure
Speculative Fiction
Poetry
Short stories
Writing dialogue
Editing
Literary agents
Proof reading
Cover design
Publicity and Marketing
Preparing Your Portfolio
Identifying Your Audience
Literary
Synopsis
Voice
Paul Garside
31/03/2014

Ah Rosa this is where my apology of the other day has to be resurrected, it was I who made a crass error of misunderstanding Adrian's post where it turned out he was quoting Nathan and I thought he was saying he was Nathan and bringing me to the wrong conclusion that Adrian is his pseudonym, not so, as I have said he was quoting Nathan it was because I couldn't find a post from Nathan that that nonsense started, so again I'm sorry hope this sorts it out once and for all. Good job I wasn't on a murder trial jury I would have implicated the judge lol. Hope this makes sense.

Regards Paul

Profile picture for user paul_garside
Paul
Garside
330 points
Ready to publish
Fiction
Comic
Crime, Mystery, Thriller
Gothic and Horror
Middle Grade (Children's)
Picture Books (Children's)
Adventure
Speculative Fiction
Poetry
Short stories
Writing dialogue
Editing
Literary agents
Proof reading
Cover design
Publicity and Marketing
Preparing Your Portfolio
Identifying Your Audience
Literary
Synopsis
Voice
Paul Garside
31/03/2014