Hi, I recently have read a few stories about writers who have sent off their manuscripts and met rejections only to change their name, to a pen name of sorts, and been accepted. I was wondering if anyone else had encountered a similair story, and whether having a catchy name is very important in getting your manuscript even seen. I am aware that it is possible that a publisher/agent will change your name around a bit (JK Rowling) but I did not think about the effect your name could have in getting your manuscript read.
If you expect a cheque in the post at some point in the future, then your own name is probably wiser. However, my guess is it would be wise to also flag that you may later choose to publish under a pen name - and also tell them your 'preferred' pen-name - leaving the door open for the publisher to comment or guide you on suitability or otherwise.
Also if the publisher reverts on your use/choice of a pen-name then surely that's a clear sign that they like your book manuscript?
Yes, this works, but you need to be careful. Small agencies and publishers don't get confused by submissions as the large firms do, they have memories. I once changed my name and title of a submission and sent it off on the rounds about two years after the original tour. One agent wrote back and asked why, if they didn't accept it the first time under the original titles, should they consider again when hardly anything had been changed. It was a lesson not to treat people like idiots.
AR
It feels a bit like I've arrived at the party after everyone's already left, but it seems like you all had fun anyway!
This is an interesting debate and one that has given me some quality procrastination fodder as I really don't think my name is strong enough; it's very common (not necessarily in the pejorative sense) and I don't think it would stand out at all.
My middle initial is "D", but that doesn't help.
I think I need a new name... at least professionally, should I ever get that far.