So.
Once one has edited, re-edited, posted up for feedback, edited some more, revised and re-edited again....And feels that they may have something that is not too embarrassing to send to agents( not really in the hope of publishing but just to gauge a reaction).
How many of you carry on editing the rest of the book to the same standard? I have been going through the book and editing over the edits and such. Should we all just focus on the first three chapters in the hope that if its published an editor will help polish the rest?
Not an excuse, I know, and I am going to carry on going through my MS because I'm enjoying the challenge. But I'm wondering what best practice is?
This is all good to know, I'm glad I have carried on editing my work. I have been editing it the grammar anyway because it's a good learning curve for me, but knowing that it has an added benefit to it makes the experience a more positive one.
Agents complain about manuscripts not matching the standard of the first three chapters.
They will not correct grammar and punctuation for you.
Agents will not be interested in a manuscript full of errors.
Want-to-be authors have to ensure their manuscript is thoroughly edited to the highest possible standard.
Laziness or sloppiness will lead to rejection.
I would go through your MS to get it all to the same standard. It would be awful if you had interest from an agent but they were turned off by the rest of the book because it appeared to need so much work. Then, as Astor mentions, it is wise to put it aside for a week or so. If when you give it a final read through you are happy, it's time to submit.